Featured Post

The Poison Papers

The Environmental Protection Agency’s mission statement reads: “to protect human health and the environment.” Ironically, while the EPA ...

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Panama Papers: ‘Everything Censored By Default’

AUSTIN, Texas — WikiLeaks took to Twitter to criticize what the organization describes as the continued “censorship” of the Panama Papers archive by the organizations and reporters who control the contents of the leak. 

The massive archive of 2.6 terabytes of financial data leaked from Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca is controlled by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, and hundreds of journalists who have been selected to write about the archive’s contents.
The Panama Papers exposed the efforts the world’s wealthiest people, including more than a dozen world leaders, take to hide their earnings from tax authorities. The release caused upheaval in Iceland’s governmentand protests in the United Kingdom.
A growing number of international authorities are demanding access to the archive, according to German broadcaster Deutsche Welle, including a German finance minister and representatives of the U.S. Justice Department. But ICIJ’s director told DW last week that they would reject these and all similar requests.
“Our focus is journalism … ICIJ, and its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity, are media organizations shielded by the First Amendment and other legal protections from becoming an arm of law enforcement,” Gerard Ryle said.
WikiLeaks sharply criticized this decision, suggesting on Tuesday that time was running out for these investigations as money is moved and evidence destroyed.
However, in an “Ask Me Anything” session on Reddit on Tuesday, the investigative unit at Süddeutsche Zeitung argued that limiting access to the archive was a way to protect the source of the leak: “As journalists, we have to protect our source: we can’t guarantee that there is no way for someone to find out who the source is with the data.”
In response, WikiLeaks slammed this as an “entirely bogus” justification by ICIJ that allows for “lucrative privatization” of the Panama Papers. Further, WikiLeaks suggested the treatment of the archive sets a dangerous precedent for future leaks:
“It is bad that @ICIJorg censors-by-default. But it is threat to all to erect this as the ‘responsible’ way for media to behave,” the organization added.
The tweets echo previous statements made by WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, who commented on the situation earlier this month from the Embassy of Ecuador in London, where he lives under political asylum.
WikiLeaks hosts publicly-accessible archives of leaked datasets, like Hillary Clinton’s private emails and hacked emails from private intelligence firms, putting Assange’s philosophy at odds with that of the ICIJ. In an April 9 interview with Al-Jazeera,  Assange insisted that openness and transparency are necessary for an archive of the size of the Panama Papers, which contains some 11.5 million documents:
“When you’ve got millions of documents, you need to make millions of documents available, citable so it’s not just a few hundred journalists, it’s all the lawyers in the world, it’s all the police in the world.”
After criticizing the current reporting on the archive for its political bias against Russian President Vladimir Putin, he urged the ICIJ to make plans to share the files.  
“[W]hat I want to hear is that there is a path, a transparent path to publishing the vast majority of that data set,” he said, “because that’s what’s interesting from a legal perspective, from a historical perspective.”

WikiLeaks’ On Panama Papers: ‘Everything Censored By Default’  

Una mole enorme di leak, 11 milioni di file e 2,6 terabyte di informazioni, che rivelano operazioni fiscali che vanno dal 1977 al 2015, all’interno del mondo della finanza offshore: nell’inchiesta condotta dall’International Consortium of Investigative Journalism sono compresi i movimenti di denaro che transitano verso i paradisi fiscali e il coinvolgimento di società e fondazioni, ma anche di clienti celebri, dai leader politici agli sportivi (parliamo di persone vicine alla cerchia di Vladimir Putin, familiari di David Cameron, Leo Messi e Jackie Chan). Secondo l’Espresso, che ha l’esclusiva per l’Italia, i nomi degli italiani citati nell’archivio sarebbero 800 (tra questi Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, Giuseppe Donaldo Nicosia e l’ex pilota di F1 Jarno Trulli).

Che cosa sono i Panama Papers aprile 4, 2016

Ci sono Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, Carlo Verdone, Barbara D’Urso e Valantino Garavani nell’elenco dei pirmi 100 nomi di italiani coinvolti nell’inchiesta dei Panama Papers. Ma non solo. Molti finanzieri, manager, imprenditori, avvocati, stilisti, sportivi e mafiosi. Nell’elenco figura anche un noto armatore, Giovanni Fagioli, e gli imprenditori romani Roberto e Stefano Ottaviani, Oscar Rovelli, erede di Nino Rovelli. Nelle carte, «affiora anche il nome di una società che porta a un vecchio affare di Silvio Berlusconi - scrivel’Espresso - : l’acquisto a prezzi gonfiati, di diritti televisivi dalle major hollywoodiane». 

Chi sono i 100 italiani coinvolti in Panama Papers 08/04/2016

I Panama Papers, 11,5 milioni di documenti finanziari appartenenti alla Mossack-Fonseca, società con sede a Panama e con succursali in molti Paesi che offriva un paradiso fiscale sicuro, fino a qualche mese fa, coinvolgono anche politici e imprenditori africani. Al momento sono stati scoperti 18 grandi ‘ladroni’, alcuni collegati o direttamente coinvolti nelle più feroci dittature del continente, quale quella del Burundi. 

Panama Papers: ‘ladroni’ africani 29 aprile 2016

Dalle informazioni in mano al consorzio risulta che sono 500 le banche coinvolte, almeno 28 sono tedesche. E tra le 10 banche che richiedono maggiormente la creazione di società offshore - siamo nell'ordine delle centinaia- cinque sono svizzere (tra cui Ubs, Hsbc e Credit Suisse) e quattro sono lussemburghesi o filiali basate in Lussemburgo di banche europee, come la Experta Corporate & Trust service banque, la Luxembourg S.A. Credit Susse, la Société Générale Bank & Trust Luxembourg (filiale dell'omonima banca francese) e la Landsbanki Luxembourg Sa (islandese). Anche Ubi Banca, uno dei due istituti di credito italiani che con Unicredit appare nei file, è coinvolta tramite una controllata in Lussemburgo. 

Panama Papers, l'offshore passa da banche europee Giovanna Faggionato 04 Aprile 2016

Swissleaks tra l'elite dell'illecito 7000 italiani FEBRUARY 9, 2015

Swiss Leaks nella Lista Falciani anche il Vaticano FEBRUARY 20, 2015

Swissleaks La Cassaforte degli Evasori FEBRUARY 11, 2015

Ti piace?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...