Featured Post

The Poison Papers

The Environmental Protection Agency’s mission statement reads: “to protect human health and the environment.” Ironically, while the EPA ...

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Investigative Journalism wins Pulitzer for Panama Papers

The Pulitzer Prizes on Monday honoured an international consortium of more than 300 reporters on six continents for their investigative series on the Panama Papers which detailed the hidden infrastructure and global scale of offshore tax havens used by the high and mighty.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, McClatchy and the Miami Herald won the explanatory award for the Panama Papers, a massive investigation into the secretive offshore companies owned by the world’s political and business elite which sparked controversy in several countries including Pakistan.
Eight off-shore companies were reported to have links with the family of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his brother, Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif. Under pressure, the government last year announced a probe into the revelations.
A case originating from the Panama Papers controversy, and which could potentially decide the future of Sharif's PML-N government, was heard by the Supreme Court in February this year.
The apex court's verdict in the case is anxiously awaited by the public, media and political circles.
“We’re honoured that the Pulitzer Board recognised the groundbreaking revelations and worldwide impact that the Panama Papers collaboration produced,” ICIJ director Gerard Ryle said.

Pulitzer for Washington Post, NY Times

The 101st edition of the Pulitzer award also honoured The Washington Post for hard-hitting reporting on Donald Trump's presidential campaign and The New York Times for revealing Vladimir Putin's covert power grab, praising their probing of powerful people despite a hostile climate for the news media.
The Daily News of New York and ProPublica, a web-based platform specialising in investigative journalism, won the prize for public service journalism for coverage of New York police abuses that forced mostly poor minorities from their homes.
The Pulitzers, the most prestigious honours in American journalism, have been awarded since 1917, often going to famed publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.
But they are also won by smaller, lesser known publications across the US whose work does not always gain national attention when it is published.
Reporter Eric Eyre of Charleston Gazette-Mail in West Virginia took the prize for investigative reporting for exposing a flood of opioids in depressed West Virginia counties with the country's highest overdose death rates.
The staff of the East Bay Times of Oakland, California, won the breaking news award for coverage of the “Ghost Ship” fire that killed 36 people at a warehouse party, exposing the city's failure to take actions that might have prevented the disaster.

'Transparent journalism'

While the Pulitzer ceremony highlighted the news media's importance to democracy, it has been challenged by so-called fake news, which once referred to fabricated stories meant to influence the US election but has become a term used by Trump to dismiss factual reporting that is critical. Trump has frequently excoriated the media and in February called it “the enemy of the American people”.
Operating in the glare of the 2016 presidential campaign, David Fahrenthold of The Washington Post took the national reporting award. The judges said he “created a model for transparent journalism in political campaign coverage while casting doubt on Donald Trump's assertions of generosity toward charities”.
Fahrenthold found that Trump's charitable giving had not always matched his public statements. He also broke perhaps the biggest scoop of the campaign, revealing Trump had been captured on videotape making crude remarks about women and bragging about kissing and grabbing them without their permission.
The Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan, a longtime Republican, took the commentary prize for a series of critical pieces about Trump during the real estate magnate's successful run for the White House.
The New York Times staff won the international reporting prize for articles on Russian President Vladimir Putin's efforts to project Russia's power abroad, a particularly pertinent story given US intelligence conclusions that Putin's government actively tried to influence the US election in Trump's favour.
The Times revealed “techniques that included assassination, online harassment and the planting of incriminating evidence on opponents”, the judges said.
Reuters was a finalist in the national reporting and breaking news photography categories. Photographer Jonathan Bachman was recognised for his image of a woman being detained by police during a protest in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
In national reporting, the Reuters team of Renee Dudley, Steve Stecklow, Alexandra Harney, Irene Jay Liu, Koh Gui Qing, James Pomfret and Ju-min Park was recognised for their series Cheat Sheet, documenting how the business of college admissions and standardised testing has been corrupted.
The 19-member Pulitzer board is made up of past winners and other distinguished journalists and academics. It chose the winners with the help of 102 jurors.
More than 2,500 entries were submitted this year, competing for 21 prizes. Seven of the awards recognise fiction, drama, history, biographies, poetry, general nonfiction and music.
Author Colson Whitehead won the fiction award for “The Underground Railroad”, a work the judges said “combines the violence of slavery and the drama of escape in a myth that speaks to contemporary America.”
The Pulitzers began in 1917 after a bequest from newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer.

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists wins Pulitzer for Panama Papers REUTERS Apr 11 2017

Bahamas Leaks SEPTEMBER 22, 2016


Ti piace?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...